Scapple keys1/12/2024 the user would need a possibility of defining which the “central” note is, either via a UI option to define a flag “this is a ‘central’ note”, or perhaps via a defined starting text in the note (e.g.(if a note already has a number because it can be reached by a different route, then this would be a signal that the assumption of “only unique routes” does not apply and that the function can be declared as “not available” - that’s OK too).This would obviously only cover those notes connected by connections to the current note the Scapple canvas might contain other notes unconnected (directly or indirectly) to the current note, and that’s OK that they wouldn’t be involved in this process. a neighbouring note would have distance 1, a note connected to a neighbouring note would have distance 2, etc.). iterate out from the current note via the existing connections, assigning a number to each note denoting the “distance” from the current note (i.e.I accept that many Scapple users do not adhere to this restriction, but a perhaps significant subset does, and for them this could prove useful. Version 1 would be to handle the “narrow” case of a “tree” of nodes with only unique routes between the nodes, i.e. How might the objections you raise be resolved? I get your point, though I think that the objections you raise are resolvable and that it is worth doing something in this respect. Thank you for your very swift and comprehensive answer! For those concepts to have answers in a machine logic sense, you need extremely strict rules that the software forces you to follow. Indeed, freely connecting anything at all would not be possible, otherwise there would cease to be one logical arrow key response to what is “higher”, what is “previous sibling”, etc. For example, we’d have to remove from you the ability to connect one note to two different notes in the “higher level” direction, and connections between siblings would no longer make sense. I think it would just take too much narrowing down of the software to say that “up” means “higher level” instead of “up”, and thus sometimes select down or even right, depending on which side of the cluster you are on. Stacks are the only thing that have a special programmed behaviour, because those are quite logical.Ĭonnections though? Granted, I understand you have chosen to use connections draw a picture of something that a human mind might interpret as hierarchical, but there is nothing like that in the software at a code level, and for there to be, we’d have to throw out a lot of what Scapple is. The current behaviour is directional, or the best that it can do with what may at times have a chaotic answer to what is “next to the right”. Would it be possible to introduce this form of shortcut-based navigation, at least as an option? Within these sections, I would find it very helpful to be able to navigate “up” (to the higher-level note) with the “up” arrow key, to siblings using the “left” and “right” arrow keys, and to a daughter using the “down” arrow key (doesn’t matter so much which daughter, since I can then use “left” and “right” to move to the right one).Īt present the behaviour does not correspond to this, and using the arrow keys leads to the active note jumping about the canvas wildly. with one central note linked to sub-notes and these in turn connected to sub-sub-notes often, a significant portion of the notes on a Scapple canvas are organised in this way. While I recognise that notes are not always arranged “hierarchically”, i.e. ![]() ![]() Specifically, I would like to be able to navigate the connections between notes using the arrow keys or similar. Instead, you will need to use the Mac App Store software to reinstall the program.I’m a user who likes to be able to use keyboard shortcuts rather than have to do everything with the mouse. If you purchased from the Mac App Store, you will not have a licence number. ![]() Please note, however, that we will be unable to retrieve licences for purchases made more than ten years ago (to comply with data protection regulations, our payment providers automatically delete customer information older than ten years). Simply send an email to our sales team at and we will look up your details for you. If you no longer have access to the email address you used upon purchase, don't worry. Be sure to use the appropriate form box (when in doubt, try both). ![]() As we switched licence providers on June 26th 2019, you will notice that there are two form boxes on this page: one for orders placed on or after this date, and one for orders placed before this date. If you deleted this email or do not have access to it, the first thing to do is visit our Lost Licence Recovery page, which will allow you to have your licence details sent to you immediately. If you still have the original confirmation email that was sent to you at the time of purchase, you should find your licence number there.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |